Click here to read the letter in full

Maureen Comber replies to the letter from the Minister

Says Maureen Comber

It is not sufficient for the present government to say that consent for carrying out “restricted works” should be expected to contain appropriate and sufficient means of access for the public. Neither is it just a matter of having strong views on the subject.

It is a matter of adhesion to the law of this land which has sought to protect the public interests over and above anybody’s view be it that of Natural England or some other government body or organisation.

It is a lamentable fact that our common lands are being enclosed by stealth and force through the bad practice of bypassing Parliament. Is this the reason that there was such haste by this government to abolish the Commons Commissioners?

Click here to read Maureen Comber's letter in full

- OUR RIGHTS TO ACCESS, UNIMPEDE COMMON LAND IS NOT FOR DISCUSSION, THOSE THAT WISH TO CREATE AREAS FOR SELECTIVE SPECIES OF PLANT AND OTHER LIFE FORMS,STICK TO THEIR OWN BACK GARDENS.

- WE ALREADY HAVE CITY AND TOWN CENTRE PARKS AND ROADSIDE HABITATS, PUT THE HLS FUNDING ETC THERE, YOU MAY ALSO REMOVE THE ABUSED CHARITY STATUS’S OF WILDLIFE TRUSTS, BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION, THE RSPB AND THE PRETENSIOUS EMPLOYEES OF NATURAL ENGLAND BEFORE THE ENTIRE EXISTANCE OF OUR NATURAL ENGLAND IS LOST FOR EVER.

Says Tony Barnett

HORSEYTALK COLUMNIST AND BHS ACCESS OFFICER MAUREEN COMBER WROTE TO HER MP DAMIAN HINDS OVER CONCERNS THAT OUR COMMON LANDS ARE BEING STOLEN AND ALL RIGHTS OF LAWFUL ACCESS EXTINGUISHED.

MAUREEN IS ALSO A CONSERVATIONIST AND THEREFORE IS MOST CONCERNED OVER THE LOSS OF NATURAL PHENOMENA WHICH, WAS FIRST CREATED SOME 17 THOUSAND YEARS AGO BY ICE PACKS TRAVELING NORTH.

THEREFORE, COMMON LANDS WERE CREATED BY THE FORCE OF NATURE, HENCE “NATURAL PHENOMENA” CONSERVATION AREAS, PLACES OF NATURAL BEAUTY.

RICHARD BENYON’S LETTER TO DAMIAN HINDS STATES “MANY OF THE MOST IMPORTANT COMMONS ARE OWNED OR MANAGED BY WILDLIFE TRUSTS OR LOCAL AUTHORITIES”

SINCE WHEN?

COMMON LANDS THAT ARE BEING STOLEN, ILLEGALLY OCCUPIED ARE COMMON LANDS THAT FOR THE 1965 CRA WERE IDENTIFIED AS SECTION 9’s, MEANING NO OWNER COULD BE TRACED BY THE COMMON COMMISSIONER.

THESE LANDS WERE “VESTED” INTO THE CARE OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY; THE VESTING GIVES NO JURISDICTION TO THE LOCAL REGISTERING AUTHORITY.

BENYONS LETTER CONTINUES; MANY COMMONS REQUIRE ATTENTION TO RESTORE AND MAINTAIN THE QUALITY OF THE FEATURES, THIA IS WHY MANAGING ORGANISATIONS ARE INVITED TO CONSIDER APPLYING FOR HLS OR ELS”

COMMON LANDS ARE “MANGAED” BY REGISTERED COMMONERS AS THE REGISTRATION PROVIDES FOR, WHERE COMMONERS MAY TAKE THE PRODUCT.

IT IS ALSO THE REMIT OF COMMONERS TO KEEP THE COMMON FIT FOR PURPOSE; THE PUBLIC MAY REPORT ANY UNKEMPT COMMON LANDS TO THE LOCAL AUTHORITY FOR THEM TO REMEDY THE SITUATION BY ORDERING THE REGISTERED COMMONERS TO “CLEAN UP THEIR ACT”.

COMMONER WHO ABUSE THEIR RIGHTS COULD LOOSE THEIR RIGHTS TO USE THE COMMON LANDS PRODUCTS.

ALL OF THE APPLICATIONS FOR HLS, HLF AND ELS ARE SUBJECT TO FALSE REPRESENTATIONS.

THIS THEN MAKES THE APPLICATIONS FRAUDULENT (SEE THE 2006 FRAUD ACT), THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE’S OFFICERS ARE UNDER ORDERS TO GIVE CONSENT TO THE APPLICANTS.

THE REASONING BEHIND THIS IS BECAUSE THE OFFICERS ARE NOT TRAINED CONVEYANCE SOLICITORS OR OF THE PROFESSION OF ESTATES CONVEYANCING.

BUT, CONSENT IS ONLY PROVISIONAL, THE APPLICANTS ARE RESTRAINED DUE TO THE SUPPLEMENTARY ISSUED WITH EACH CONSENT AND UNTIL EVIDENCE IS DISCLOSED TO SHOW A LEGAL APPLICATION WAS MADE, ANY WORKS STARTED OR COMPLETED MAY BE REMOVED BY ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, LAWFULLY.

IN TRUTH, APPLICATIONS FOR CONSENT TO ENCLOSE, IS ALSO TO OBTAIN HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF £’s FROM NATURAL ENGLAND, THIS MONEY IS NOT “RING FENCED”, IT CAN AND IS USED FOR OTHER AGENDAS AS I FOUND OUT FROM “SHROPSHIRE WILDLIFE TRUST” IN 2006.

BOTH APPLICATIONS HAVE AGENDAS TO TURN OPEN ACCESS CONSERVATION COMMON LANDS INTO “NATURE RESERVES” AND TO KEEP ON APPLYING FOR HLS AND OTHER FUNDINGS FOR LIFE.

FURTHER IN BENYONS LETTER HE REFERS TO “MRS COMBER’S” CONCERNS ABOUT THE WAY APPLICATIONS ARE CONSIDERED UNDER s38 OF THE 2006 CA, HE GOES ON TO SAY PINS ARE RESPONSIBLE ON BEHALF OF THE SOS FOR DETERMINING SUCH APPLICATIONS” RUBBISH!

IT IS GAME SET AND MATCH, THERE IS NO DETERMINATION BY THEM, IT IS PROCEDURE SET OUT BY CENTRAL GOVERNEMENT TO “GIVE” CONSENT, ALL THIS LOAD OF BOLLOCKS ABOUT GIVING REGARD TO COMMONERS AND THE NEIGHBOURHOOD IS JUST A BLIND.

BENYON’S COLLUSION IN THIS FRAUDULENT ACT OF ASSISTING THE CORRUPT LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND BENT “CONSERVATIONIST” IN GAINING PAYMENT FOR THEIR CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES NOW ADDS INSULT TO INSULT TOO INJURY, IN A FURTHER STATEMENT “I RECOGNISE THE IMPORTANCE AND VALUE OF COMMON LAND FOR PUBLIC ACCESS, BIO DIVERSITY, LANDSCAPE, AGRICULTURE AND HERITAGE REASONS, I ALSO ACCEPT THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE AND ORGANISATIONS WHO HAVE STRONG BUT OFTEN DIFFERING VIEWS AS TO THE CORRECT APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF OUR COMMON LANDS”

THE ONLY PEOPLE HE IS LISTENING TOO ARE HIS BENT COLLEAGUES AND QUANGOS, NOT THE PEOPLE THAT MATTER.

BENYON ALSO SUPPORTS GATES ON COMMON LAND, ALSO FENCING, WELL THEN BRAINS OF BRITAIN, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INJURY TO MAN AND BEAST OCCASIONED BY SUCH MAN MADE IMPEDIMENTS?

IS THERE TO BE INSURRANCE COVER TAKEN OUT BY THOSE THAT ERECT THE ENCLOSURES?

AS ALL OF THE APPLICATIONS ARE MADE BY THOSE THAT DO NOT HAVE LOCUS STAN-DI, WHAT ABOUT THE REPEAL OF THE ENCLOSURE ACT AND THE PROHIBITION OF ANY ENCLOSURE?

ARE WE TO ASSUME THAT PARLIAMENT WILL AGAIN CONVEIN TO REPEAL THOSE ACTS 47-1 AND 47-2 OR SCHEDULE 4 PARAGRAPH 6 OF THE 2006 CA?

GET REAL AND DEFEND THE HONEST PEOPLES OF THIS COUNTRY, OR RESIGN AND LET THOSE THAT ARE WILLING TO COMPLY WITH DEMOCRACY AND THE LAWS OF THIS LAND TAQKE YOUR PLACE.

OUR RIGHTS TO ACCESS, UNIMPEDE COMMON LAND IS NOT FOR DISCUSSION, THOSE THAT WISH TO CREATE AREAS FOR SELECTIVE SPECIES OF PLANT AND OTHER LIFE FORMS,STICK TO THEIR OWN BACK GARDENS.

WE ALREADY HAVE CITY AND TOWN CENTRE PARKS AND ROADSIDE HABITATS, PUT THE HLS FUNDING ETC THERE, YOU MAY ALSO REMOVE THE ABUSED CHARITY STATUS’S OF WILDLIFE TRUSTS, BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION, THE RSPB AND THE PRETENSIOUS EMPLOYEES OF NATURAL ENGLAND BEFORE THE ENTIRE EXISTANCE OF OUR NATURAL ENGLAND IS LOST FOR EVER.