Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS

click here to read more

Says Sally Edwards and Jo WareSays Sally Edwards and Jo Ware

Helicopters. THEY ARE BAD ENOUGH TO COPE WITH WHEN THEY ARE FLYING LOW OVER-HEAD .............. read more

TONY BARNETT APPLIES TO SHREWSBURY MAGISTRATES COURT TO LIFT ORDERS AGAINST HIM
REF; 1100045303.

JUDGE MORGAN'S OWN STATEMENT WAS THAT THE MATTERS BEFORE HIM WERE OUTSIDE HIS JURISDICTION, HE, BEING A CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE WHEN THE MATTERS BEFORE HIM WERE OF A CIVIL NATURE AND COULD NOT CONTINUE.

Says Tony Barnett

Says Tony BarnettI, ANTHONY BARNETT, APPLY TO THIS HONOURABLE COURT TO LIFT JUDGEMENT ORDERS PLACED ON ME BY JUDGE MORGAN ON THE GROUNDS THAT HE, JUDGE MORGAN, WAS NOT FIT AND PROPER PERSON TO AJUDICATE.

JUDGE MORGANS OWN STATEMENT WAS THAT THE MATTERS BEFORE HIM WERE OUTSIDE HIS JURISDICTION, HE, BEING A CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE WHEN THE MATTERS BEFORE HIM WERE OF A CIVIL NATURE AND COULD NOT CONTINUE.

HISTORY SHOWS THAT JUDGE MORGAN DID CONTINUE AND PASS SENTENCE AGAINST ME WITHOUT EXAMINING MY FOLDER AND REFUSING MY RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLE 6 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS TO A FAIR TRIAL.

THE ACTIONS AND THE SUPPORT OF APPEAL COURTS TO JUDGE MORGANS UNFAIR DECSIONS ARE IN DANGER OF DESTROYING A 700-YEAR-OLD RIGHT OF ACCESS TO FAIR AND OPEN JUSTICE TO ALL

AS ONE OF THE THREE REMAINING ARTICLES OF THE MAGNA CARTA 1297 SAYS “TO NO MAN SHALL WE DENY JUSTICE” NOWADAYS “TO NO MAN AND NO WOMAN SHALL WE DENY JUSTICE”, THE COURTS IN MY EXPERIENCE ARE AT RISK OF GOING BACK ON THAT ACT.

MY EXPERIENCE HAS ALSO UNCOVERED THE REASONS BEHIND THE COURTS AND LEGAL REPS NOT TO REPRESENT CLIENTS TO THE BEST OF THEIR ABILITY, THE SOLICITORS SHOW TO MUCH DEFERENCE TO THE BENCH (NICETIES) AND THE JUDGE SUPPORTS THE LOCAL AUTHORITY AND ANY ORGANISATION UNDER THAT AUTHORITIES WING, LAYMEN ARE TREATED AS UPSTARTS.

JUDGE MORGAN WAS DISPROPORTIONATE (BIAS) IN HIS DECSION, IT IS FOR THIS REASON WHY HIS ORDERS MUST BE LIFTED, I HAVE COMMITTED NO CRIME OR ACTED OUTSIDE THE LEGISLATION PROVIDED IN THE 2006 COMMONS ACT.

IF IT IS THE COURTS WISH TO HAVE THIS MATTER TO BE REFERED TO THE HIGH COURT IN LONDON BECAUSE SHROPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ARE INVOLVED ALSO, THEN IT WILL BE MY WISH TO.

Cc SUPREME COURT PRESIDENT LORD NEUBERGER.

MORE LEGAL SUPPORT FOR TONY BARNETT

Richard writes to Tony Barnett

Judge Morgan is said to have 'retired' during the process. Judge Cadbury got office on condition he completed the frauds Judge Morgan started.

Says Richard

My response to the questions is Yes and No.
Please email scans of the Orders + Revocation Applications.

The Coalition Government agreed to investigate and remedy court corruption. They got corruption admissions from State Officers and used them to test what judges did with the evidence. DVLA officers admitted a Driving Licence Revocation Fraud against my client. Judge Morgan trierd to cover it up by an Evidence Limitation Order that had the effect of excluding the Fraud Proof. The DVLA officers ignored the Evidence Limitation Order and included the Fraud Proof in the Trial Bundle. Judge Morgan allocated the trial to Judge Jones. He acknowledged the Fraud Proof and declared it did not matter to give reasurance it was safe to continue with the State Case. The State Counsel was reassured but the State Expert was not and refused to give evidence. Judge Jones pretended my client needed an adjournment to cover it up. Judge Morgan contiued to service Defence Frauds and Prosecution Frauds for the State against my client

I got issue of a Court Corruption Review Cases for my client. Shropshire Council Mental Health Team serviced an Attempted Mental Incapacity Certification Fraud in an effort to get control of the cases. We stopped it. The Lord Chancellor for the Crown and Secretary of State for Justice for the Cabinet filed No Contest Notices. It reduced Top Judges to Remedy Only Powers. The Corrupt Police Commissioner Dismissal by Parliament broke the confidence of Top Judges they could rely on the police to corrupt any investigation they ordered. They used dismissal powers for a Dismissal Order Fraud and thereby proved they were respsonible for the corruption that damaged my client.

Judge Morgan is said to have 'retired' during the process. Judge Cadbury got office on condition he completed the frauds Judge Morgan started.

Says Tony Barnett

Says Tony BarnettGATES OR STILE’S WILL ONLY BE LAWFUL AS LONG AS THE REASONS FOR THE INSTALLATIONS ARE SERVING THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED.
ANY STOPPING UP OR CLOSING OFF OF RIGHTS OF WAY SHOULD BE CHALLENGED FOR APPROVAL/CONSENT FROM THE APPROPRIATE MINISTER OF THE CROWN
........... read more

Read more here


Email this to a friend !!

Enter recipient's e-mail: