Says Tony Barnett

CHIEF EXECUTIVE

YOUR RESPONSE?(NOT SIGNED) PERHAPS YOU WILL SEND A HARD COPY OF THIS, YOUR LETTER WITH YOUR SIGNATURE AFFIXED TO IT?

THE LETTER GIVES DETAILS OF YOUR PLANS TO FENCE PADWORTH COMMON, PERHAPS ALSO YOU WILL SEND WITH THE SIGNED HARD COPY, EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT WBC HAS PRE-REGISTRATION OF TITLES TO THIS COMMON LAND.

COPIES OF HOW THIS COMMON LAND WAS ACQUIRED.

TO INCLUDE WBC'S REGISTRATION TO ALLOW GRAZING OF THE COMMON LAND AS COMMONERS,OR EVIDENCE TO SHOW COMMON LAND "SURPLUS" TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE REGISTERED COMMONERS, ALREADY INSITU, TO ALLOW WBC "QUASI RIGHTS"

YOUR SECOND PARAGRAPH IS COMPLETELY FALSE, I AM THE ONE(IF YOU HAVE READ MY EMAILS) THAT HAS BEEN AT THE FOREFRONT OF THE OBJECTIONS TO YOUR FALSE REPRESENTATIONS TO PINS CLAIMING TO "OWN" PADWORTH COMMON, OR TO HAVE ANY JURISDICTION ON THE COMMON.

I HAVE DISCLOSED TO YOU, YOUR COLLEAGUES AND TO THE LOCAL INHABITANTS OF THE AREA, LEGISLATION FROM THE 2006 COMMONS ACT, THIS, MY INTERVENTION AND THE SOLIDARITY SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC HAS BEEN THE MAIN REASON THAT YOUR APPLICATION WAS WITHDRAWN.

TO SAY I HAVE NOT ENGAGED IN ATTEMPTS AT REACHING "A SOLUTION" IS AS FALSE AS YOUR APPLICATION.

MAY I SUBMIT TO YOU (IF YOU ARE THE AUTHOR OF THE ATTACHMENT) MAKE A PUBLIC STATEMENT THAT YOU HAVE DIRECTED S.MCWILLIAM, TO APPLY TO PINS, AS OWNERS OF PADWORTH COMMON, FOR WORKS TO ENCLOSE THE COMMON AND FOR THE TOTAL DESTRUCTION OF INDIGENOUS PLANT LIFE?

AS YOU? HAVE STATED IN YOUR ATTACHMENT I APPLY FOR, SO FAR MY PREVIOUS REQUEST HAVE NOT BEEN MET WITH.

MY MANNER IN MY WRITINGS ARE NOT VEXATIOUS, THEY ARE EXPLOITATIVE AND STRAIGHT TO THE POINT, IF YOU VIEW MY REQUESTS AS SUCH AND UNREASONABLE, THEN YOU HAVE BEEN CHALLENGED TO DISCLOSE/EXPLAIN YOUR REASONS FOR TRYING TO MISLEAD YOUR RATEPAYERS.

I DO NOT INTEND CORRESPONDING WITH ANY PERSON JUNIOR TO YOUR POST, YOU ARE ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS.

THE ATTACHMENT AND THIS MY RESPONSE WILL BE COPIED TO APPEAR ON A WELL SUBSCRIBED TO WEB PAGE.