British Eventing
Horseytalk.net is now on Twitter
British Horse Society
NagMag
The Brooke
EquestrianCupid.com - the best horse-lover dating site!
EquestrianCupid.com - the best horse-lover dating site!
Equine Superstore
World Horse Welfare
The Donkey Sanctuary - Cyprus

Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS

click here to read more

Says Adrienne Yentis

Says Adrienne YentisA friend of mine recently was riding on the heath
and she came across a group of cattle strung out across the bridlepath with no way through – the only way off was to turn round. Fortunately her horse
remained calm throughout. But you can imagine how a nervous horse might react ........... read more

Frensham Common, Hampshire
Tony Barnett writes to Prince Charles,
President of the National Trust

- IN ESSENCE THERE IS NO DEFINITIVE OWNERS REGISTER, THE CLAIM BY THE TRUST, CANNOT BE USED AS A REFERENCE, THERE IS NO REGISTRATION TO GIVE THE TRUST ANY LOCUS STAN-DI.

- I HAVE MADE STRONG, BUT I BELIEVE CORRECT STATEMENTS, THAT THE TRUST ARE IN BREACH OF THE SECTIONS/ENACTMENTS AS IDENTIFIED UNDER THE 2006 FRAUD ACT.

- I HAVE OBTAINED INFORMATION FROM THE CHARITIES COMMISSION THAT IT DOES NOT SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF NON-COMMUNICATION BY THE NATIONAL TRUST AND THE PUBLIC.

Says Tony Barnett

Says Tony Barnett YOUR ROYAL HIGHNESS.

SIR. MAY I ONCE AGAIN WRITE TO YOU ON MATTERS OF GREAT CONCERN, BUT THIS TIME AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL TRUST?

I HAVE BEEN ASKED TO BECOME INVOLVED IN COMMON LANDS IN THE SURREY AREA, TO WHICH THE SOLICITOR AT THE NATIONAL TRUST STATES QUITE CATAGORICALLY, IS OWNED BY THE TRUST.

THE COMMON LANDS INVOLVED ARE IN THE FRENSHAM AREA, CL87 WHICH IS THE COMMON LAND, CL232 WHICH IS CALLED THE GREAT POND AND CL430 KNOWN AS THE LITTLE POND.

THERE IS SITUATED ON CL87, THREE BARROWS, SITED ON THE “KINGS RIDGE” PART OF THE COMMON LAND CL87.

BECAUSE OF THE CLAIMS BY THE TRUSTS SOLICITOR TIM BUTLER, WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL, SUBJECT TO A LEASE OF THE COMMON LAND CL87 FROM THE TRUST, APPLIED TO THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE FOR CONSENT TO CARRYOUT WORKS ON THE COMMON.

THE APPLICATION, AS IS DETAILED IN THE APPLICATION WAS FOR CONSENT TO ENCLOSE THE THREE ANCIENT MONUMENTS, “THE THREE BARROWS”, FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS TO ENABLE THE RE-GROWTH OF THE VEGITATION OVER THE BARROWS.

THIS CONSENT YOUR HIGHNESS COULD HAVE BEEN APPLIED FOR BY THE TRUST.

CONSENT WAS APPROVED BY THE INSPECTORATE, BUT, CONDITIONS, KNOWN AS A “SUPPLEMENTARY”, WAS ATTACHED TO THE CONSENT, WHICH STATES THAT PROVIDING THE WORKS ARE NOT IN BREACH OF ANY ENACTMENTS OR BYE-LAWS, THE WORKS WILL BE LAWFUL.

UNTIL THE CONDITIONS ARE MET WITH, THE CONSENT REMAINS PROVISIONAL.

YOUR HIGHNESS WILL BE FULLY ARMED WITH THE KNOWLEDGE, THAT ALL PARLIAMENTARY BILLS, PASSED BY PARLIAMENT, RECEIVE ROYAL ASSENT AND THEREFORE THE BILLS/LEGISLATIONS BECOME THE LAWS OF THE LAND.

FURTHER TO THE CLAIMS BY THE TRUST, FURTHER DEEDS OF GRANT IN THE FORM OF LEASES TO THE WHOLE OF THE REGISTERED COMMON LAND CL87 WAS MADE TO WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL, SIGNED AND DATED BY THE SENIOR SOLICITOR, TIM BUTLER AT THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE TRUST.

THE DEEDS OF GRANT OF LEASES WERE ALSO TO INCLUDE THE TWO PONDS CL232 AND CL430.

WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL, IN TURN, HAVE SUB-LEASED THE TWO PONDS FOR SPORTING ACTIVITIES IN LINE WITH THE LEASES MADE BY THE TRUST.

THE SPORTING ACTIVITIES INCLUDE ANGLING AND SAILING ON BOTH PONDS.

YOUR HIGHNESS, THE BREACHES OF ENACTMENTS, OCCASIONED BY THE APPLICANTS WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL, MAY MITIGATE, THAT ASSURRANCES OF LEGAL OWNERSHIP BY THE TRUST WAS MADE AND AS SUCH THE STATEMENT ON THE APPLICATION FORM TO PINS, THAT THE OWNERS HAVE APPROVED THE APPLICATION OF THE APPLICANT COULD BE SEEN AS HONEST.

SINCE BECOMING INVOLVED WITH THE TRUST AND COUNCIL EMPLOYEES, ON BEHALF OF THE NEIBOURHOOD AND LEASE HOLDERS, APPLICATIONS FOR DISCLOSURE OF PRE-REGISTRATION OF TITLES AND CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS, PURPORTED TO BE HELD BY THE TRUST, HAVE REVEALED NOTHING CONCLUSIVE.

INDEED, NO DOCUMENTS TO SHOW OWNERSHIP OR LEGAL OCCUPATION CAN BE DISCLOSED.

A STATEMENT FROM THE COMMONS REGISTARION AUTHORITIES AT SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL SHOWS THAT THERE IS NO DEFINITIVE OWNERS REGISTERED TO CL87, CL232 OR CL430, THERE IS JUST THE REGISTER OF COMMON LAND UNDER THE 1965 CRA AND THE COMMONERS RIGHTS REGISTER UNDER THE SAME ACT

IN ESSENCE THERE IS NO DEFINITIVE OWNERS REGISTER, THE CLAIM BY THE TRUST, CANNOT BE USED AS A REFERENCE, THERE IS NO REGISTRATION TO GIVE THE TRUST ANY LOCUS STAN-DI.

YOUR HIGHNESS, THE COMMON LAND CL87 IS REGISTERED WITH COMMONERS RIGHTS FOR GRAZING AND EASTOVERS.

THE TWO PONDS CL232 AND CL430 ARE ALSO REGISTERED WITH COMMONERS RIGHTS TO PISCARY.

SIR, THE 2006 COMMONS ACT STATES THAT COMMONERS MAY NOT; LET, LEASE, SELL OR EXTINGUISH THE RIGHTS SO ATTACHED TO THE PROPERTY.

A CLAIM BY THE TRUST AND COUNCIL IS THAT COMMONERS APPROVED THE LEASES AND SUBLEASES OF THEIR RIGHTS.

YOUR HIGHNESS, YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF COMMON LAND LEGISLATION IS WITHOUT QUESTION, MAY I ALSO SAY THAT THE TRUST AND COUNCIL SHOULD ALSO BE ARMED WITH SUCH QUALIFICATIONS.

APART FROM THE AFORE MENTIONED ACTS, I HAVE ALSO REMINDED THE NATIONAL TRUST THAT THE ACTIVITIES IN RELATION TO THE PONDS, IS COVERED BY THE CROW ACT OF 2000.

THE ACT PROVIDES THAT IT IS PROHIBITED TO INJURE ANY ANIMAL BIRD OR FISH, OR TO BATHE OR SAIL ON NON-TIDAL WATERS.

THE ACT ALSO PROHIBITS THE INTERFERANCE OF LAWFUL PUBLIC ENJOYMENT AND TO ERECT SIGNAGE TO MISLEAD.

YOUR HIGHNESS MY POINT IS THAT THE TRUST, APART FROM THE MONUMENTS HAVE NO LOCUS STAN-DI ON THE OTHER PARTS OF THE REGISTERED COMMON LANDS.

THEY HAVE AND STILL ARE ENGAGED IN UNLAWFUL OBJECTIVES IN COLLUSION WITH WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL, IN SETTING LEASES TO OBTAIN CAPITOL REWARDS.

THE INJURED PARTIES ARE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, THOSE THAT HAVE BEEN COERSED INTO PAYING LARGE SUMS OF MONEY TO FISH, SAIL AND TO PARK VEHICLES ON COMMON LAND, WHEN THE DEVELOPMENTS ARE UNLAWFUL AND THE SPORTSMEN AND WOMEN ON COMMON LAND ARE MET WITH DEMANDS FOR MONEY TO USE COMMONERS RIGHTS.

YOUR HIGHNESS, I HAVE MADE STRONG, BUT I BELIEVE CORRECT STATEMENTS, THAT THE TRUST ARE IN BREACH OF THE SECTIONS/ENACTMENTS AS IDENTIFIED UNDER THE 2006 FRAUD ACT.

FALSE REPRESENTATION, FAILURE TO DISLOSE AND ABUSE OF OFFICE, ARE THE STATEMENTS I HAVE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF TIM BUTLER THE SOLICITOR AT THE TRUST.

MAY I CONCLUDE YOU’RE HIGHNESS BY SAYING THAT MY LETTERS AND EMAILS TO THE TRUST, WHICH WERE MEANT FOR MEMBERS, IN THE POST’S OF PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN, DEPUTY CHAIRMAN AND DIRECTOR- GENERAL, WOULD BE FORWARDED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NATIONAL TRUST TO THOSE PERSONS, THIS PROMISE HAS NOT BEEN KEPT, SUCH, IS THE DIS- HONESTY OF THE EMPLOYEES AT THE NATIONAL TRUST?.

I HAVE NOW BEEN INFORMED THAT FURTHER RESPONSES TO MY INQUIRIES WILL NOT BE ENTERTAINED BY ANY DEPARTMENT OF THE TRUST.

I HAVE OBTAINED INFORMATION FROM THE CHARITIES COMMISSION THAT IT DOES NOT SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF NON-COMMUNICATION BY THE NATIONAL TRUST AND THE PUBLIC.

Says Linda WrightSays Linda Wright

We moved to a Shropshire location a year ago having surveyed the local OS map and noted the significant number of bridleways around the property. Sadly the map appears a total fiction. Scarce any of the bridleways are usable ........... read more

Read more here


Email this to a friend !!

Enter recipient's e-mail: