Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS

click here to read more

The Governement should sycamore rider-friendly policy !

APPLICATION FOR WORKS ON CHAILEY COMMON REGISTER UNITS CL3 AND CL4.

THE APPLICATION HAS FAILED TO MEET WITH LEGISLATION AND THEREFORE THE WORKS ARE UNLAWFUL

THERE IS NO UNDER SIGNING BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE TO THE APPLICATION, WE ASK WHY?

Says Tony Barnett

Says Tony Barnett ALTHOUGH THE APPLICATION OBTAINED CONSENT, WE CAN BE ASSURED THAT THE APPLICATION HAS FAILED TO MEET WITH LEGISLATION AND THEREFORE THE WORKS ARE UNLAWFUL.

THE REASON;

THE LEGISLATION PROVIDES THAT WITH ALL APPLICATIONS GIVEN CONSENT, THERE IS ALWAYS A “SUPPLEMENTARY” ISSUED.

THE CONSENT GIVEN (BIAS) BY PINS, CAME WITH THE SUPPLEMENTARY WHICH READS. THE DECISION DOES NOT CONVEY ANY CONSENT OR APPROVAL WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED UNDER ANY ENACTMENT (BYE-LAW, ORDERS OR REGULATIONS).

IN ENGLISH IT MEANS THAT IF THE WORKS ARE IN BREACH OF ANY ENACTMENT, THEN THE WORKS WILL BE UNLAWFUL.

THE APPLICATION BY THE AUTHORITY WAS MET WITH THE QUESTION “DO YOU OWN THE COMMON” THE REPLY WAS NO.

DOES THE OWNER-S, OR IS THE OWNER-S AWARE OF THE APPLICATION, OR HAS THE/AN OWNER-S GIVEN CONSENT FOR THE WORKS, REPLY WAS YES.

I HAVE OBTAINED THE ONLY RECORDS HELD BY THE COUNCIL ON CHAILEY COMMONS CL3 AND CL4.

MY REQUEST IN FURTHERANCE OF MY INVESTIGATIONS, WAS FOR THE COUNCIL TO DISCLOSE IDENTITY OF THE “OWNER” AS WAS/IS SUGGESTED ON THE APPLICATION FORM, NONE HAS BEEN DISCLOSED.

I HAVE INFORMED THE COMMONS REGISTERING OFFICER THAT THERE COULD BE A CLAIM BY THE PUBLIC OF FALSE REPRESENTATIONS, WHICH UNDER THE 2006 FRAUD ACT IS IDENTIFIED AS FRAUD.

TWO OTHER MAIN ENACTMENTS ARE SECTION 47 s1 WHICH HAS REPEALED THE ENCLOSURE ACT, SECTION 47 s2 PROHIBITS ENCLOSURE.

AS THESE ACTS WERE IN PLACE PRE THE APPLICATION, THEN THE APPICANTS WERE AWARE OF THE PROHIBITION’S., THEY CHOSE TO ADVANCE THEIR AGENDA.

THERE IS NO UNDER SIGNING BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE TO THE APPLICATION, WE ASK WHY?

ITEM 3, ON THE CONSENT PAPER IS AN ATTEMPT AT CLAIMING THAT COMMONERS RIGHTS HAVE BEEN ABANDONED, NO DOCUMENT TO SHOW ABADONMENT IS AVAILABLE, AND THERE IS NO ENFORCEMENT ON COMMONERS.

STILL ON ITEM 3, ALSO MENTIONED SSSI, THIS FLAG OF COVEINANCE HAS NO JURISDICTION ON COMMON LAND!!

THE REASONS ARE, COMMON LANDS ARE FOR AIR AND EXERCISE BY THE PUBLIC, THE SURFACE OF THE COMMON LAND MAY BE USED BY THE PUBLIC FOR HORSE RIDING, PICNICS, ANY ACCIDENTIL DISTURBANCE OF NATURAL PHENOMENA IS NOT CRIMINAL.

COMMONERS THAT HAVE REGISTERED RIGHTS, WILL BY THEMSELVES THROUGH LAWFUL ACTIVITIES OR BY LIVESTOCK CAUSE DISTURBANCE, THE FLORA AND FAUNA IS FOR LIVESTOCK EATAGE, WINTER KEEP.

SAND, GRAVEL AND STONE FOR RIGHTS IN THE SOIL, TURF, PANAGE.FIREWOOD FROM EASTOVERS, PISCARY.

APART FROM TURBURY, ALL OTHER REGISTERED COMMONERS RIGHTS, AS IS PUBLIC OPEN ACCESS, IS TAKEN AS A PRAIRIE CUSTOM OF OBTAINING THE PRODUCT, OPEN SPACE THE COMMON GIVES OUT, LAWFULLY.

THE FIRST “S” IN SSSI, STANDS FOR SITE, THIS WILL INCLUDE THE ENTIRE PARCEL OF LAND.

WHATEVER THE PARASITES IDENTIFY AS SSSI, IT HAS NO PROTECTION FROM NATURAL PERSUITS, UNLESS IT IS PRIVATLEY OWNED LAND.

ALSO MENTIONED IN THE APPLICATION IS THE LOGO OF “LNR” LOCAL NATURE RESERVE, COMMON LANDS ARE NOT, AND NEVER CAN BE IDENTIFIED AS NATURE RESERVES.

FOR A FURTHER UNDERSTANDING OF RESERVE, ONE NEED TO ACCESS A DICTIONARY, THE WAY NATURAL ENGLAND, BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION RSPB AND WILDLIFE TRUST DICTATE IS THAT THE AREA IS FOR A STIPULATED SPEICES, THROUGH SELECTION, THAT IS NOT CONSERVATION.

YET, THEY ALL CLAIM TO PROTECT CONSERVATION, YES OF THEIR OWN SELECTION, NO CHARITY OR QUANGO HAS A HIGHER STATUS THAN THAT OF MEMBERS OF THE OUBLIC FOR AIR AND EXERCISE.

THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION ON OR OVER THE FLORA, FAUNA, SOIL AND WATERWAYS.

ANY MEMBER OF SUCH PARASITIC QUANGO OR CHARITY THAT WISHES TO REPORT TO THE POLICE OR COURTS WILL HAVE NO SUPPORT FROM THE COUNCILS AND BOARDS OF THEIR ORGANISATIONS.

ANYONE THAT NOW WISHES TO TAKE EXCEPTION TO THE WORKS, FENCING ETC, IS AT LIBERTY TO DO SO IN ORDER TO CHALLENGE THE CONSENT AND POWERS OF THE COUNCIL.

COMMONERS OF THE AREA SHOULD ALSO SUPPORT THE REMOVAL OF THE WORKS ETC CONSENTED TO, THERE WILL BE PUBLIC LIABILITY ON ANY OF THE WORKS HELD BY THE COUNCIL.

I pine for a more sensible approach to saving our forests

Read more here


Email this to a friend !!

Enter recipient's e-mail: