- THE ACTIVITIES BY THE FARMER ARE UNLAWFUL, THE TAKING OF REVENUE FROM HIM AS TENANT, PUTS CWT ON THE ROAD TO PROSECUTION.

- GATES WERE APPLIED FOR TO PREVENT INGRESS AND EGRESS, CONSENT WAS GIVE BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR THE DURATION OF THE NECESSITY, THAT TIME HAS ELAPSED AND THE GATES ARE UNLAWFUL

Says Tony Barnett :

CORNWALL WILDLIFE TRUST APPLIED FOR HLF TO "PURCHASE" COMMON LAND IN CORNWALL AND ARE NOW CALLING IT "CORNWALL WILDLIFE TRUST NATURE RESERVE"

RESERVES ARE ON PRIVATELY OWNED LAND, THEY CAN BE LANDS VESTED BY THE CROWN FOR THAT PURPOSE BUT RIGHTS ARE STILL ACCESSED JUST AS VAUGHAN ROBERTS OF NATURAL ENGLAND ACCEPTS, BUT COMMON LANDS OWNED OR NOT, REMAIN AREAS OF NATURAL PHENOMENA OPEN ACCESS COMMON LANDS.

HOWEVER, CWT CLAIM THAT PART OF "CHUN DOWNS" IS A NATURE RESERVE AND OWNED BY THEM BUT UNDER AN ESA(NOW HLS) TO A LOCAL FARMER UNTIL 2020, NATURAL ENGLAND'S MR ROBERTS SUPPORTS THAT DECLARATION BY CWT.
.
I HAVE CHALLENGED CWT TO DISCLOSE EVIDENCE TO THAT EFFECT, A SPOKES WOMEN STATED THAT THEY HAD THE ANCIENT ROUTE TO TITLE AND WOULD DISCLOSE, REALLY?

THE ACTIVITIES BY THE FARMER ARE UNLAWFUL, THE TAKING OF REVENUE FROM FROM HIM AS TENANT, PUTS CWT ON THE ROAD TO PROSECUTION.

THERE WILL BE NO PUBLIC LIABILITY HELD BY THE TENANT OR CWT FOR ANY ACCIDENT OCCASIONED BY THE UNLAWFUL FARMING ACTIVITIES.

GATES WERE APPLIED FOR TO PREVENT INGRESS AND EGRESS, CONSENT WAS GIVE BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR THE DURATION OF THE NECESSITY, THAT TIME HAS ELAPSED AND THE GATES ARE UNLAWFUL.

THE GATES WHICH COULD BE EASILY OPENED TO ALLOW ACCESS, COULD AT THE TIME SUBJECT TO PUBLIC LIABILITY ON THE FARMNERS INSURANCE POLICY, NOW DEFUNCT, THERE WILL BE SUCH COVER.

IT IS THE REMIT OF THE COUNCIL TO ENSURE THAT THEY ARE REMOVED, THIS APPARENTLY HAS NOT OCCURRED, THEY THEN SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ACCIDENT.

I HAVE HAD OCCASION TO SPEAK WITH ADRIAN BIGG, THE ACCESS OFFICER FOR BHS, ALSO MARK WESTON DIRECTOR OF ACCESS, BOTH SEEM TO THINK THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO MEMBERS TO FREE THE LAWFUL ACCESS.

YET, SOMEHOW THINK THEY HAVE THE REMIT TO AGREE ON GRAZING ON COMMON LAND AND DECISION ON ENCLOSURE GATES ETC. OF RIGHTS OF WAY, THEY DO NOT AND SHOULD OBJECT TO ANY FORM OF IMPEDIMENT, BHS IS FOR RIGHTS OF ACCESS AND SAFETY FOR ITS MEMBERS.

ONE MUST APPRECIATE THAT MARK IS ONLY ONE AND THEREFORE CANNOT DO EVERYTHING OR KNOW EVERYTHING THAT'S WHY ACCESS OFFICERS ARE THERE, THERE IS ALSO TRUSTEES, BUT IF THEY ARE NOT EXPERIENCED IN ACCESS LAW, THEN WHAT GOOD ARE THEY?

THERE ARE REPORTS THAT ACCESS OFFICERS ARE NOT SUPPORTING MEMBERS, I MYSELF CAN POINT TO SOME, BUT MARK SUPPORTS THEM AND WILL NOT THEREFORE LOOK INTO THEIR FAILURES.

TRUE, MEMBERS DO NOT WANT TO HAVE TO STAND ALONE IN COMPLAINING OF THE LACK OF SUPPORT, SO DO NOTHING,HOWEVER, SOME MAKE CONTACT WITH HORSEYTALK, PETER THEN ASK'S ME TO BECOME INVOLVED.

I HAVE WRITTEN TO LYNN PETERSEN AND MARK, THE CEO NEVER RESPONDS BUT PASSES THE REMARKS ONTO MARK, IS SHE THEN NOT REQUIRED TO PERSONALLY BECOME INVOLVED? IF NOT WHY? MEMBERSHIP FEES AND OTHER FUNDING PAYS HER SALARY, SO WHY WILL SHE NOT EVEN ANSWER EMAILS OR COME TO THE PHONE?

WE GET REPLIES FROM THE QUEEN AS A FEW PEOPLE WILL CONFIRM THAT HAVE WRITTEN OVER COMMON LAND MATTERS, LYNN PETERSEN IS A PAID REPRESENTATIVE, THE CEO OF BHS, SO WHAT IS THE PROBLEM.?

I SUSPECT SHE HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE ACCESS LAWS AND THEREFORE CANNOT GIVE AN ANSWER, SO WHY MAKE THE STATEMENT "TIME FOR CHANGE" TO WHAT?

AS IT STANDS AT THE MOMENT ATTEMPTS AT RESOLVING BROXHEAD COMMON THROUGH THE COURTS IS BEING CONSIDERED, IT COULD BE THAT WE GO IT ALONE WITHOUT THE BHS SOLICITOR THROUGH LACK OF COURAGE AND CONVICTION, TIME FOR CHANGE LYNN?

THE ACT THAT PROVIDES THE PUBLIC WITH RIGHTS(LOCUS STAN-DI) IS AN EASY ONE, LAYMEN SUCH AS I, DO USE THE ACT, HOWEVER, A SOLICITOR, NOT BOUND BY COURT "NICETIES" IS PREFERRED, MARK WESTON IS BOUND TO SERVE BHS AND THEREFORE NOT SUBJECT TO THIS TYPE OF MISREPRESENTATION, BUT HE NEEDS THE CO-OPERATION OF THE CEO AND TRUSTEES.

MEMBERS ONCE ASSURED BY BHS WILL COME FORWARD, UNTIL THAT HAPPENS, PUBLIC RIGHTS OVER COMMON LAND, OPEN ACCESS LANDS AND OTHER ANCIENT RIGHTS OF WAY WILL BE LOST, AND WE THE TAXPAYER FOOT THE ENORMOUS WAGES THAT NATURAL ENGLAND AND THE PARASITE WILDLIFE TRUSTS ENJOY, GET INVOLVED, DON'T LEAVE IT TO THE FEW.

I HAVE BEEN PROMISED THAT IF AN APPLICATION INTO THE WAY HLS FUNDING HAS BEEN OBTAINED, BY THE THE TENANT FARMER OF CORNWALL WILDLIFE TRUST, ON COMMON LAND THAT THE TRUST CLAIMS TO OWN, THROUGH PURCHASE WITH FUNDING FROM HLF, ON CONDITION THAT THE LOCALS MAKE THE APPLICATION.

ACCESS OFFICER FOR HAMPSHIRE MAUREEN COMBER HAS AGREED TO WRITE TO THE HERITAGE LOTTERY FUNDING ON THE MANNER IN WHICH THE APPLICATION WAS MADE TO SECURE THE FUNDING BY THE CORNWALL WILDLIFE TRUST, SHE WILL BE THOROUGH, MAKE NO MISTAKE.