British Eventing
Horseytalk.net is now on Twitter
Four Paws

Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS

click here to read more

The Governement should sycamore rider-friendly policy !

Crookham and Greenham Commons, West Berkshire

Tony Barnett writes to Nick Carter, Chief Executive, West Berkshire Council

THERE IS NO INFORMATION REGARDING REQUISITION/DE REQUISITION OR REINSTATEMENT OF CROOKHAM AND GREENHAM COMMON ON THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT

YOU SHOULD NOW STOP FALSE CLAIMS BEING MADE BY YOUR COLLEAGUES

 

Says Tony BarnettSays Tony Barnett

I HAVE TO DAY HAD CONFIRMATION THAT NEITHER COMMON LANDS APPEAR ON THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT OF LANDS SOLD BY THE MOD TO COUNCIL.

TO QUOTE, THERE IS NO INFORMATION REGARDING REQUISITION/DE REQUISITION OR REINSTATEMENT OF CROOKHAM AND GREENHAM COMMON ON THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT.

MAY I ALSO POINT OUT TO YOU NOW, THAT NEITHER COMMON LAND WAS REGISTERED UNDER THE LANDS REGISTRATION ACT 1925 OR 36.

MAY I ALSO INFORM YOU OF THE FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF DOCUMENTS AND FALSIFICATION OF PEDIGREE AS IDENTIFIED UNDER THE 1925 LAW OF PROPERTY ACT?

THE `1925 LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 PROVIDES... THE ONLY ESTATES IN LAND WHICH ARE CAPABLE OF SUBSISTING OR OF BEING CONVEYED OR CREATED AT LAW ARE- AN ESTATE IN FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE IN POSSESSION....AN EASEMENT,RIGHT, OR PRIVILEGE IN OR OVER LAND FOR AN INTEREST EQUIVALENT TO AN ESTATE IN FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE IN POSSESSION OR A TERM OF YEARS ABSOLUTE.

AS NO PRE REGISTRATION OF TITLE DEEDS, NO LORD OF THE MANOR ETC ARE ABLE TO BE DISCLOSED TO OWNERSHIP OF EITHER GREENHAM AND CROOKHAM COMMON, PERHAPS YOU SHOULD NOW STOP FALSE CLAIMS BEING MADE BY YOUR COLLEAGUES.

I pine for a more sensible approach to saving our forests

Read more here


Email this to a friend !!

Enter recipient's e-mail: