LORD MARCHER, OWNER OF ALL OF THE HISTORICAL MANORIAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO HARTLEBURY IS TO QUESTION WCC AND THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND OVER THEIR CLAIMS TO HOLD THE ORIGINAL CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT TO HARTLEBURY COMMON

Says Tony Barnett

LORD MARCHER, OWNER OF ALL OF THE HISTORICLE MANORIAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO HARTLEBURY IS TO QUESTION WCC AND THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND OVER THEIR CLAIMS TO HOLD THE ORIGINAL CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT TO HARTLEBURY COMMON.

LORD MARCHER ACCEPTS THAT THERE ARE NO TITLE DEEDS TO THE MANOR OF HARTLEBURY, BUT DOES HOLD MANORIAL DOCUMENTS.

THESE DOCUMENTS HAVE STATUTORY PROTECTION UNDER THE MANORIAL DOCUMENT RULES, THEY ARE DEFINED IN THE RULES AS COURT ROLLS, SURVEYS,MAPS,TERRIERS, DOCUMENTS AND BOOKS OF EVERY DESCRIPTION RELATING TO THE BOUNDRIES, FRANCHISES,WASTES, CUSTOMSOR COURTS OF A MANOR.

THESE DOCUMENTS INCLUDE COPYHOLD ADMISSIONS AND COPYHOLD SURRENDER DOCUMENTS, COURT LEET AND COURT BARON AND COURT ROLLS.

THESE ARE ORIGINAL MANORIAL DOCUMENTS AND ARE WRITTEN ON VELLUM AND PARCHMENTS SKINS AND DATE C850., HOWEVER NO REGISTERED TITLE UNDER QUO WARRANTO WAS EVER MADE.

NO LAND WAS CONVEYED TO THE ECCLESIASTICLE, HOWEVER CERTAIN GRANTS WERE GIVEN MAINLEY FISHING.

INC1558 SIR FRANCES JOBSON OBTAINED AN ACT CONFIRMING HIS TITLE "TO THE MANOR" IN MARCH THAT YEAR IN SPITE OF THE PROTESTS OF THE BISHOP.

THERE IS SOME EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT THE CLAIMS BY THE CHURCH AND WCC ARE FALSE, I AM ABLE TO OBTAIN MORE BUT WE WILL WAIT AND SEE WHAT THE OWNER OF THE DOCUMENTS HAS TO SAY.