Horseytalk.net EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS

click here to read more

The Governement should sycamore rider-friendly policy !

IN DEFENCE OF RIGHTS OF UNIMPEDED ACCESS TO COMMON LAND. CASE No1WROO987.

TONY BARNETT TURNS DOWN OFFER OF A MEETING WITH WORCESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL

- IN ESSENCE I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT A MEETING IS NECESSARY, AND THAT ANY DISCUSSION ON THESE MATTERS SHOULD GO BEFORE A HIGHER COURT, AND NOT BEFORE ANY COURT IN WORCESTER.

- WCC DOES NOT OWN THE COMMON NOR HAS ANY JURISDICTION ON THE LAND.

- I HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN THE COURTS OF WORCESTER TO GIVE AN UNBIASED JUDGEMENT, I THEREFORWE APPLY TO THIS COURT TO REFER THESE MATTERS TO THE HIGH COURT QUEENS BENCH IN LONDON.

SSays Tony Barnettays Tony Barnett

ON 16TH JULY 2012 HH CIRCUIT JUDGE RUNDELL ORDERED THAT DEFENCE STATEMENTS TO BE DELIVERED TO WORCESTER COUNTY COURT.

IT WAS ALSO SUGGESTED THAT WE, THE DEFENDANTS TO HAVE A MEETING WITH TOM POLLOCK, SOLICITOR AT WCC.

THE SUGGESTION IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, AS THE PERSON ULTIMATLY RESPONSIBLITY FOR THE ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL STAFF, LIES WITH THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE TRISH HAINES.

SHOULD A MEETING BE ARRANGED, IT MUST BE WITH THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE, ACCOMPANIED IF SHE REQUIRES WITH THE COUNCILS LEGAL DEPARTMENT.

THE MEETING, IF IT IS DECIDED TO GO A HEAD,IT WILL NOT BE FOR ANY COMPROMISE, FROM OUR SIDE.

IN ESSENCE I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT AMEETING IS NECESSARY, AND THAT ANY DISCUSSION ON THESE MATTERS SHOULD GO BEFORE A HIGHER COURT, AND NOT BEFORE ANY COURT IN WORCESTER.

MY PREFERANCE IS FOR THE HIGH COURT IN LONDON, I CANNOT ACCEPT THAT LOCCAL COURTS WILL GIVE AN UNBIASED JUDGEMENT AGAINST THEIR OWN LOCAL AUTHORITY.

SINCE THE MATTERS BEGAN, I HAVE WRITTEN TO THE COUNCIL FOR FULL DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE TO SHOW OWNERSHIP OF HARTLEBURY COMMON CL68.

I HAVE IN MY FILES A COPY LETTER FROM TOM POLLOCK TO SAY THAT THE COUNCIL DOES NOT HOLD ANY TITLE DEEDS TO SHOW LOCUS STAN-DI, YET HOLD A LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENT.

SEVERAL REQUESTS FROM ME TO TRISH HAINES FOR DISCLOSURE OF THE APPLICATION TO THE LAND REGISTRY FOR REGISTRATION, HAS NOT BEEN MET WITH, THIS DOCUMENT CAN ONLY BE IN THE FORM OF A STATUTORY DECLARATION.

THE APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE BY LIZ NETHER, AND SIGNED BY HER, IS NOT UNDERSIGNED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OR THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT.

AGAIN I APPLY FOR A STATEMENT TO EITHER SHOW SUPPORT FOR THE APPLICATION, OR SHE KNEW NOTHING ABOUT THE APPLICATION UNTIL IT WAS CHALLENGED.

THE APPLICANT WAS ALSO WARNED THAT PROVIDING THE WORKS WERE NOT IN BREACH OF ANY ENACTMENT OR BYE-LAW THEY WOULD BE LAWFUL.

I SUBMIT THAT THE ENACTMENT OF FALSE REPRESENTATION HAS BEEN BREECHED ON THE APPLICATION FORM.

WCC DOES NOT OWN THE COMMON NOR HAS ANY JURISDICTION ON THE LAND.

THE ACT OF ENCLOSURE WAS REPEALED IN THE 2006 COMMONS ACT, AND ALSO PROHIBITED IS ANY ACT OF ENCLOSURE OF COMMON LAND.

APPLYING FOR OR ACCEPTING FUNDING FROM NATURAL ENGLAND UNDER FALSE REPRESENTAION, I SUBMITT WCC IS USING HARTLEBURY COMMON AS COLLATERAL.

DISTURBING WILDLIFE AND HABITAT IS IN BREECH OF THE 2000 CROW ACT, I ALSO SUBMIT THAT CRIMINAL DAMAGE 1971-1WAS VISITED TO THE COMMON LAND ON INSTRUCTIONS FROM WCC.

ON BEHALF OF WORCESTER COMMONS ASSOCIATION MEMBERS NOW BEFORE THIS COURT, I APPLY FOR DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE THAT WILL SHOW THAT THE APPLICANTS WORCESTER COUNTY, HAVE GOOD TITLE TO HARTLEBURY COMMON CL68.

I WILL ALSO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR DISCLOSURE OF THE COMMON OWNERS REGISTER TO SHOW THE COUNCIL AS OWNERS, DISCLOSURE OF THIS DOCUMENT WILL ALSO SHOW TITLE DEEDS OR STATUTORY DECLARATION.

THE AUTHORITIES AND THE REGISTERS

THE DUTIES OF THE REGISTRATION AUTHORITIES ARE LARGELY ADMINISTRATIVE: TO COMPILE, MAINTAIN AND WHERE AUTHORISED AMEND THE REGISTERS.

THE FORM AND CONTENT OF REGISTERS IS PRESCRIBED BY COMMONS REGISTRATION (GENERAL) REGULATIONS 1966(S I 1966/1471) AS AMMENDED BY Sis 1968/658, 1980/1182/210, REFERRED TO AS THE 1966 REGULATIONS.

THE REGISTERS ARE REQUIRED BY S3(2) OF THE 1965 CRA TO BE OPEN TO INSPECTIONNBY THE PUBLIC AT ALL REASONABLE TIMES.

4(1) SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION, A REGISTERING AUTHORITY SHALL REGISTER ANY LAND AS COMMON LAND OR A TOWN OR VVILLAGE GREEN OR, AS THE CASE MAY BE ANY RIGHTS OF COMMON OVER OR OWNERSHIP OF SUCH LAND, ON APPLICATION DULY MADE TO IT AND ACCOMPANIED BY SUCH DECLARATION AND SUCH OTHER DOCUMENTS (IF ANY) AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED FOR THE PURPOSE OF VERIFICATION OR OF PROVING COMPLIANCE WITH ANY PRESCRIBED CONDIDTIONS.

I CLAIM THAT WCC HAS BEEN VEXATIOUS IN ITS CLAIMS, TO WHICH I AND OTHER MEMBERS OF WORCESTER COMMONS ASSOCITON HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO, AND WILL THEREFORE PLACE BEFORE THE COURTS CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES TO OUR GOOD CHARACTERS.

IT IS ALSO CLAIMED SUBJECT TO FALSE REPRESENTATIONS, WHICH WERE SPOKEN BEFORE JUDGE KHAN TO BE PERJURES, THE SAME CLAIMS AND STATEMENTS SUBJECTED ONE MEMBER STEVE MC CARRON TO WRONGFUL ARREST AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT.

IN G&KLADENBAU Ltd-V-CRAWLEY AND deREYA (1978)1WLR 266 IT WAS HELD THAT A SOLICITOR WHO NEGLIGENTLY FAIED TO SEARCH THE REGISTERS OF COMMON LAND WAS LIABLE IN DAMAGES TO A CLIENT WHO SUFFERED FINACIAL LOSS.

WCC DID NOT NEED TO SEARCH THE REGISTER; I STATE THAT IT WAS/IS THEIR INTENTION TO DEFRAUD THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND REGISTERED COMMONERS.

I HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN THE COURTS OF WORCESTER TO GIVE AN UNBIASED JUDGEMENT, I THEREFORWE APPLY TO THIS COURT TO REFER THESE MATTERS TO THE HIGH COURT QUEENS BENCH IN LONDON.

I pine for a more sensible approach to saving our forests

Read more here


Email this to a friend !!

Enter recipient's e-mail: