Says Tony Barnett

DAVID LOWE, THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER IS THE COUNCIL MEMBER CHARGED WITH THIS ENQUIRY.

MY INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE CLAIMS THAT WBC ARE THE OWNERS OF PADWORTH COMMON IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE FREEHOLD TITLE TO THIS COMMON LAND HAS PROVOKED DISCLOSURE OF A CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT AND A LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENT, NEITHER SHOW CONCLUSIVE RIGHTS ON OR OVER PADWORTH COMMON.

A REMEDIAL STATEMENT FROM PAUL HENDRY READS "WE DO NOT HAVE ANY PRE REGISTRATION OF TITLES, AND WE DO NOT NEED THEM TO PROVE OWNERSHIP" BRINGS TO THE RATEPAYER OF THE COUNTY WHAT THEY PAY FOR.

A FURTHER STATEMENT ON THE LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENT IS THAT "WE DISCLOSED THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT TO OBTAIN BK169607 FROM GLOUCESTER LAND REGISTRY".

I HAVE WRITTEN TO GLOUCESTER LAND REGISTRY OFFICE OBJECTING TO THE MANNER IN WHICH THE LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENT WAS GIVEN AND REQUESTED THAT THE REGISTRATION BE SCRATCHED OUT, THERE SHOULD BE A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE APPLICATION, THIS WOULD SHOW IN THE STATUTORY DECLARATION WHICH, IN THE ABSENCE OF TITLE DEEDS WOULD BE REQUIRED.

THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT IS NOT CONCLUSIVE WITHOUT THE PRE REGISTRATION OF TITLES, AND THEREFORE THE APPLICATION SHOULD HAVE BEEN DENIED.

I FEEL THAT A LOT OF MY TIME (GIVEN FREELY) WILL BE LEFT TO GATHER DUST BY THE INHABITANTS OF THE AREA, THEY SHOULD NOW BE DEMANDING THAT THE WORKS TO INCLUDE THE WANTON DESTRUCTION OF THE INDIGENOUS PLANT LIFE AND EXCAVATIONS CARRIED OUT BY WBC, SHOULD BE MADE TO BE PUT RIGHT, AFTER ALL COMMON LANDS ARE A CONSERVATION AREA AND NOT A RESERVATION, SO ALL SIGNAGE SHOULD ALSO BE REMOVED, THAT IS THE LEAST THEY CAN DO TO MAINTAIN AND TO RETURN THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF THE AREA, AND TO KEEP IT IN SUCH CONDITION FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS TO COME.