Says Tony Barnett

THIS MAN HAS STICK INSECT’S IN THIS COUNTRY, EVEN MORE AND GROWING WITH OUT ANY CONTROL.

THEY DO HOWEVER HAVE PREDATORS; I AM ONE OF A GROWING COLONY.

THE ARTICLE GOES ON TO SAY THAT A CAPTIVE BREEDING COLONY WAS STARTED IN AUSTRALIA FROM TWO OF THESE INSECTS CALLED “ADAM AND EVE”.

WHY GO TO THOSE LENGTHS WHEN I KNOW WHERE THERE IS MALE’S AND FEMALE’S BELONGING TO “HIS” COLONY IN “THIS COUNTRY”; THERE IS A MARTIN, A JOHN, A STEPHEN, A JENNY AND A JULIE, WHICH ARE CROSS BREEDING WITH STICK INSECTS FROM NATURAL ENGLAND.

ONE OF THE COLONIES IS IN SHROPSHIRE WHERE I AM WRITING THIS SEGMENT FROM, AS FAR AS I AM AWARE MR. ATTENBOROUGH HAS NOT EVEN SET FOOT ON THIS PARTICULAR AREA EVEN THOUGH HE HAS BEEN INVITED TO DO SO.

THE STATE OF THE LAND BEARS NO GREEN CROP FOR SUSTANANCE OF ANY SORT, THERE IS NO HABITAT, SO THERE IS NO INCENTIVE WHY THE INSECTS (WHICH ONLY VISIT FROM TIME TO TIME) SHOULD BREED, SUCH IS THE DEVISTATION OF HABITAT ETC IN THE AREA.

THIS ONCE THRIVING AREA OF NATURAL OUTSTANDING BEAUTY (NATURAL PHENOMENA) NOW RESEMBLES THE “NUL-LAR-BOOR” IN AUSTRAILIA, DEAD AND FEATURELESS.

ATTENBOROUGH IS THE SORT OF HYPOCRITE WHO WOULD CUT DOWN OUR MIGHTY OAKS AND THEN STAND ON THE STUMPS AND PREACH CONSERVATION, IN A STATEMENT HE SAID” PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO CARE ABOUT ANIMALS AND PLANTS CONSERVATION UNLESS THEY THINK THEY ARE WORTHWHILE”, HOW TRUE!

THIS THEN IS THE IDEA BEHIND THE CREATION OF “NATURE RESERVES”; THESE AREA’S CONSIST OF SELECTED SPECIES, NOT CONSERVATION OF NATURAL PHENOMENA, BIO DIVERSITY, AND INDIGINOUS WILDLIFE AND HABITAT, THOSE NOT WANTED ARE RUTHLESSLY EXTINGUISHED.

COMMON LANDS, ARE, BY NATURE, CONSERVATION AREA’S, AREA’S OF NATURAL PHENOMENA, WHICH DOES NOT FEATURE IN TYPES OF NATURE CONSERVANCEY PREACHED BY HIS ORGANISATION.

I SAY THIS IS THE TRUE AGENDA OF THE PRETENTIOUS CONSERVATIONIST LIKE WILDLIFE TRUST’S, RSPB; THEIR SELECTIVE PREFERANCES APPEAR UNDER SSSI, THE BREAD WINNER OF THESE PARSITIC CLANS, THIS BREAD IS OVER A BILLON’S £ STRONG AND MOUNTING!

BEING A RETIRED LANDSCAPE GARDENER, I KNOW OF ONLY ONE PLANT INDIGINOUS TO THIS COUNTRY, TO US IT IS A WEED, BUT TO BOTANIST’S IT IS FLORA AND, IT IS PART OF OUR LANDSCAPE.

THIS PLANT, IT IS HELD BY THE PROFESSION AS “USELESS” BY NAME, IT CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY THE DARK MARK ON IT’S LEAF, THE HELD BELIEF IS THAT THE NAME USELESS WAS GIVEN THIS TO PLANT BY MOTHER NATURE WHEN NAMING PLANTLIFE, THE DARK MARK IS SAID TO HER THUMP PRINT, BELIEVE OR ACCEPT WHAT YOU WILL, IT ALWAYS GETS REMOVED ANYWAY BY GARDENERS.

ALTHOUGH GIVEN THE NAME USELESS, IT IS PART OF NATURAL PHENOMENA AND, ON COMMON LAND IT WILL BE CLASSED AS HERBAGE, FOOD FOR THE OMNIVORES, COMMONERS LIVESTOCK, ALSO HABITAT ETC FOR INSECT, WILDLIFE.

I AM JUST MAKING FINAL PREPS FOR MY COURT APPEARANCE ON MONDY 20th, AND GOING THROUGH MY FILES I HAPPENED UPON A LETTER SENT TO ME BY NE, WARNING ME AGAINST ENDANGERING SSSI, FOR FEAR OF A £20,000 FINE THAT COULD BE IMPOSED UPON ME.

THE ACT THAT HOGARTH OF NE QUOTES IS AN AMMENDMENT ACT UNDER S9 OF THE 2000 CROW ACT.

THIS ACT IS ONLY ENFORCABLE UNDER CERTAIN LEGAL CONDITIONS, AS I HAVE STATED BEFORE, SSSI HAS NO JURISDICTION ON LAND THAT IS NOT OWNED BY ANY OF THE PARASITIC ORGANISATION AFORE MENTIONED, OR ON LAND NOT LEGALLY OCCUPIED.

QUOTE; SCHEDULE 9 OF THE ACT AMENDS SSSI PROVISIONS OF THE WILDLIFE AND COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1981, TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS TO CHANGE SSSI’s AND PROVIDING INCREASED POWERS FOR THEIR PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT.

THE PROVISIONS EXTEND POWERS FOR ENTERING INTO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS; PLACE A DUTY ON PUBLIC BODIES TO FURTHER THE CONSERVATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SSSI (“THEIR FLAG OF CONVENIANCE”(AS STATED NATURE RESERVES, AND NOT CONSERVATION AREAS).

THE ACT GOES ON TO SAY (IN FAVOUR OF THE PARASITES) INCREASES PENALTIES ON CONVICTION WHERE PROVISIONS ARE BREACHED; AND INTRODUCE A NEW OFFENCE WHEREBY THIRD PARTIES CAN BE CONVICTED FOR DAMAGING SSSI’s (NATURE RESERVES)

TO ENSURE COMPLINCE WITH THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998, APPEAL PROCESSES ARE INTRODUCED WITH REGARDS TO THE NOTIFICATION, AND MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION OF SSSI’s.

I AM USING THIS, WHITCHURCH HEATH COMMON, OR prees heath IS NOT A NATURE RESERVES, AND NOT SUBJECT TO SSSI’s.

SCHEDULE 12 OF THE 1981 ACT HOWEVER STRENGTHENS THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF INDIGINOUS SPECIES AND THE POWERS OF ARREST, FOR RECKLESS DISTURBANCE, INFORMATION IS WELL PROVIDED UNDER THE CROW ACT 2000.

THIS SECTION CAN AND SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT BY THOSE OF YOU THAT HAVE ISSUES WITH YOUR LOCAL AUTHORITY AND PARASITIC ORGANISATIONS WHEN TAKING OUT INDIGINOUS PLANTLIFE TO CREATE ENCLOSURE OF COMMON LANDS ETC.

THE COMMON LANDS I BECOME INVOLVED WITH, SIMULAR TO WHITCHURCH HEATH COMMON CL21, HAVE NO ONE TO GRANT LAWFUL DEEDS OF EASEMENT LET ALONE CONVEYANCE.

BECAUSE OF THIS, SSSI ON THESE COMMONS HAS NO JURISDICTION; THEREFORE, ALSO, NATURAL ENGLAND CANNOT REACH ANY AGREEMENTS OF OCCUPATION OR ANYOTHER CLAIM OF LAWFUL USE.

WHAT NEEDS INVESTIGATING IS THE ABUSE OF PUBLIC FUNDING THAT REGIONAL NE TEAMS PROMISE TO GIVE TO COUNCILS AND OTHERS IF APPLICATIONS FOR FENCING AND OTHER UNLAWFUL ACTIVIIES TO PINS IS SUCCESSFUL, THAT IS MORTGAGE FRAUD.

SOME OF THE CLAIMANTS THEN USE THE CONSENT GIVEN TO REGISTER OWNERSHIP WITH THEIR LOCAL LR TO OBTAIN A REGISTRATION DOCUMENT, WHICH SHOW PROPRIORTYSHIP OF THE SAID COMMON LAND.

APENDIX 7 OF THE LAND REGISTRY ACT PROVIDES; the land registry forms that incorporate a statement of truth include the following warning of the consequences of fraud.

The warning also applies to a freestanding statement of truth and to a statutory declaration.

“if you dishonestly enter information or make a statement that you know is, or might be, untrue or misleading, and intend by doing so to make a gain for yourself or another person, or to cause loss or the risk of loss to another person, you may commit the offence of fraud under section 1, of the fraud act 2006(FALSE REPRESENTATION) the maximum penalty for which is 10 years imprisonment or an unlimited fine or both”.

A STATEMENT OF TRUTH MEANS; is made in writing, or contains a declaration of truth in the following forms: - I believe that the facts and matters contained in this statement are “true” and are signed in accordance with paras 2-6.

IN SOME OF THE COMMONS NOW BEING CHALENGED THERE ARE LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN OBTAINED UNLAWFULLY AS DESCRIBED ABOVE.

ALL THE MORE REASON THEN TO CHALLENGE COUNCIL LEADERS, NE AND OTHERS PLUS THE LANDREGISTRY’S THAT GIVE SUCH DOCUMENTS RECKLESSLY, AND TO THE APPLICANTS.

THIS IS AND HAS BEEN THE NUCLEUS OF MY FIGHT, I EXPECT NO QUARTER AND I GIVE NO QUARTER, NEITHER DO WE, COMMON HERITAGE EXPECT TO BENEFIT FROM ANY FINANCIAL REWARD, COMMON HERITAGE IS VOLUNTARY, AND FOR PUBLIC SERVICE.

"Bravo, well said Tony" Says Maureen McComber

"Seconded!" Says Steve Yandall