click here to read more

Says Naomi Smith

Says Naomi SmithIt is all too possible to round a corner on horseback and come upon a group of cattle with no prior warning -this WILL result in a horse being badly spooked at best, bolting at worst -it is only a matter of time ........... read more

Tony Barnett and Shropshire County Council

"I will claim damages and court cost's, bring it on, the court cannot give judgement against me without documentary evidence to show ownership of freehold property. "

Says Tony Barnett

Says Tony Barnett I have been involved with Shropshire local government since 2001, mainly with the office called the legal department, I wonder if they have chosen a title without knowing what it means or stands for, just plucked the name from mid-air, my thoughts on solicitors is they are the one's that have shops in the high street but will not take on clients that have an argument with the council, so there can be no credible defence/prosecution service offered to the public, my experience!

The councils are of the opinion that mere mortals like the public also have to jump through hoops as do council officers down the ladder, as in this case is, when dealing with me, the local terrorist, just one man and I have them surrounded.

Because of the fraudulent occupation and development of part of Whitchurch Heath Common CL21 using an aka to acheive the councils objective, and the strength of the police and courts to ward off any attempt at taking back which belongs to the public and those with other rights, there is no need in its view to become concerned, so no need to employ professional person's.

I have been given judgement by circuit Judge Mitchell sitting at Telford County Court that I am able to remove all unlawful developments and other works from CL21, doing it is something else as the lawful rights to remove unlawful impediments from this registered common land CL21 is criminally denied, turning from civil to criminal courts and so the removals are now identified as criminal damage/breach of the peace and so on.

I must add another malajusted act of this council, one of putting the phone down, this I suspect is that Ms,Gurzon is unable to hold a conversation on any legal matters, she and the other parasites are just content to receive public money without doing anything for it.

Anyway, the issue now is court action which they have droped themselves in, it is action that they cannot suport or disclose reasons why the council has lodged an objection to my application, the courts a Birmingham have made the order which does not include me.

My action under S41 is because of the ignorant approach to the legislation, common land law, S 41 is an application to dismantle or remove all unlawful works, and is for civil action, not criminal, but there is provisions for the offenders to foot the bill.

All attempts at gaining the correct procedure through the county courts have been blocked by the council to protect them from Mortgage fraud where the vehicle park concerned and so all of the other Mortgage Fraud by those now in occupation is also protected, this then shows the collusion between the entire authority, it also exposes the willing collusion of the legal profession in preventing clients from using article 6 of the human rights act by allowing the courts to deny full disclosure of evidence from the otherside.

As afore mentiond there are papers before the Chancery under S41, these papers originally were sent to the County Court Telford to be sent on to London, but they were sent to Birmingham to be read by a district judge with "Chancery Experience" this shows the ignorance of the judge in this legislation, and democracy.

There is no claim from me for prosecution, this should have been observed by the court and the "solicitor" Claire Porter and her underling Helen Powell from the council, equaly as ignorant is the firm Roythorne & co, Paul Osborne, the lead conveyancer was the one that identified mortgage fraud but has not prevented his colleague and client from continuing from this practice.

This firm, although having the legislation made clear to them have followed the council by sending in objections to my application, but also an application to strike out, they have no jurisdiction/locus stan-di, for what reason have they given? to be able to take such action, title deeds and conveyance documents to pre-date 1189 must be disclosed and if I am required to attend I will claim damages and court cost's, bring it on, the court cannot give judgement against me without documentary evidence to show ownership of freehold property.

I was asked by Telford county court if anyone "might" object to my application, I named all that claim to own or occupy the common land CL21, I had contacted them individually and requested evidence, there is none to be disclosed so no one acknowledged, however Telford county court took it upon itself and gave particulars of the persons that might object and recorded that information on the court order forms, now the council and others find themselves in court of their own making and ordered to disclose.

Can't wait till January when that hearing comes up, I won't take any notice anyway.

Read Tony Barnett's letter to the Court

Says Linda Wright

Says Linda WrightWe moved to a Shropshire location a year ago having surveyed the local OS map and noted the significant number of bridleways around the property. Sadly the map appears a total fiction. Scarce any of the bridleways are usable ........... read more

Read more here