Writes Tony Barnett

I WATCHED WITH INTEREST THE STRONG QUESTIONING YESTERDAY, IN THE HOUSE, WITH REGARDS TO THE "CASH INDUCEMENTS" THAT WILL GAIN FAVOUR TOO AN AUDIENCE WITH THE PRIME MINISTER, NOT ANY DIFFERENT FROM YOUR PARTIES ACTS OF COLLUSION!

I HAVE A SIMILAR ARGUMENT/QUESTION AND ANSWER TO PUT TO YOURSELF.

AT THE TIME OF THE 2005/6 COMMONS ACT, WHICH WAS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT, [YOU WERE IN POWER AT THE TIME] AND THE IN 06 HER MAJESTY WAS CAUSED TO GRANT ROYAL ASSENT TO THAT BILL, WHICH THEN WOULD HAVE CLOSED THE DOORS TIGHT, MAKING THAT/THOSE BILL/S LAWS OF THIS LAND!

THIS BILL/ACT HOWEVER HAS NOT AND IS NOT BEING ADHERED TO AND THE MAIN OFFENDERS ARE QUANGOS SET UP BY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT, AND PRIVILEGED WITH THE SUPPORT OF THIS GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO DEFRAUD THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND ABUSE THE PUBLIC PURSE!

THE QUANGO IS NATURAL ENGLAND, IT WAS CORRUPT ENOUGH WHEN IT WAS ENGLISH NATURE AND GAINED PUBLIC MONIES TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY.

NOW IT IS A CENTRAL GOVERNMENT BODY, IT IS ABLE TO TAKE THAT CORRUPTION EVEN FURTHER BY USING CASH AS INDUCEMENTS TO OUR LOCAL AUTHORITIES, WHO, WITH A LONG STANDING TRADITION,GAINED BY EVOLUTION, WERE EXPERTS IN CORRUPTION, TO MAKE FALSE REPRESENTATIONS TO THE MALADMINISTRATION OFFICES OF YET ANOTHER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OFFICE, FOR CONSENT, AS OWNERS OF COMMON LANDS FOR ENCLOSURE/APPROVEMENT.

NATURAL ENGLAND HAS'NT STOPPED THERE, IT IS USING THE SAME CASH INDUCEMENTS TO " CONSERVATION ORGANISATIONS", CHARITIES?.

WITH THESE "CHARITIES" THAT BEGINS AT HOME, JOBS FOR THE ILLITERATE, OTHERWISE THE UNEMPLOYABLE, BUT ONE MUST KEEP THE UNEMPLOYED FIGURES DOWN SOMEHOW, SHOW THAT THE GOVERNMENTS DOING A GOOD JOB.

ANOTHER CORRUPT ORGANISATION WILDLIFE TRUSTS OF THE VARIOUS COUNTIES ALSO BENEFIT FROM CASH INDUCEMENTS FROM NATURAL ENGLAND, THEY TO CLAIM OWNERSHIP AND OTHER RIGHTS OF COMMON LANDS, AND THEN, AS WITH THE OTHER FRAUDULENT BASTARDS, RECLASSIFY COMMON LANDS AS "NATURE RESERVES" SSSI, SHUTTING OUT/EXTINGUISHING COMMONERS RIGHTS AND PUBLIC OPEN ACCESS FOR FEAR OF BEING FINED £20,000 +, FOR WHAT, IN LAW THEY HAVE NO LOCUS STAN-DI!

SECTION 9 OF THE 1965 CRA WAS REPEALED BY THE 2006 COMMONS ACT, THE LEGISLATION HOWEVER WAS SUBSTANTIALLY RE-ENACTED, AND THE SECTION WAS REPLACED BY SECTION 45 OF THE 2006 COMMONS ACT[PASSED BY PARLIAMENTARY BILL AND GIVEN ROYAL ASSENT] IT IS THE LAW! SO HOW, CAN A CONVEYANCE, DEEDS OF GRANT, BE IMPLEMENTED? THE 2006 ACT ALSO SUBSTANTIALLY RE-ENACTED THE PROHIBITION BY COMMONERS TO "LET,LEASE,SELL OR TO EXTINGUISH THE RIGHTS OF COMMON AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY THAT THE RIGHTS ARE SO REGISTERED!

THE BILL GAVE US SECTION 41, IT HAS NO TEETH, NATURAL ENGLAND WERE PART OF THE TEAM THAT SET UP THE 2006 COMMONS ACT, NO COURT, EXCEPT A CRIMINAL COURT WILL GO AGAINST THE LOCAL AUTHORITY, THE POLICE AS GOOD AS TELL ONE TO PISS OFF, WE ARE NOT FIGHTING YOUR PROBLEMS, IT IS FRAUD WE ARE REPORTING, NOT A FANCY DRESS PARTY, ONE CANNOT GAIN A CRIMINAL COURT EVEN WHEN ONE IS CHARGED WITH CRIMINAL DAMAGE FOR REMOVING UNLAWFUL IMPEDIMENTS, THE CHARGE IS BROUGHT DOWN TO CIVIL.

THE 2006 COMMONS ACT SECTION 47-1 REPEALED THE 1285 SECTION 219 ACT OF RIGHTS TO ENCLOSE/APPROVE BY "LORDS OF THE MANOR", SECTION 47-2 OF THE ACT PROHIBITS ANY ACT OF ENCLOSURE THAT MAY SUBSIST ALONGSIDE OF THE 1285 SECTION 219 ACT, BOTH ACT HAVE NOW BEEN EXTINGUISHED.

IT STANDS TO REASON THEN, BENT OR OTHERWISE APPLICATIONS FOR ENCLOSURE OF COMMON LANDS SHOULD BE DENIED BECAUSE OF THE ACTS, THIS I WOULD SAY HAS FORCED NATURAL ENGLAND TO SHOOT THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT? AS THEY HAVE NO BRAINS OR CONSCIOUS THE ONLY OTHER PLACE WOULD HAVE BEEN IN GENITALIA!

THE BILL GAVE US SCHEDULE 4 PARAGRAPH 6, WE USE THIS FREQUENTLY, UNDER THAT INCLUSION IN THE 2006 COMMONS, IN REMOVING ANY AND ALL ENCLOSURES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN OCCASIONED THROUGH CONSENT BY FALSE REPRESENTATIONS IS NOT BREAKING THE LAW!! ALL OF THE CLAIMS,APPLICATIONS BY THE AFORE MENTIONED ARE WELL CATERED FOR IN THE 2006 FRAUD ACT;- FALSE REPRESENTATION, FAILURE TO DISCLOSE, ABUSE OF OFFICE/POSITION, LOSS AND GAIN ETC, NOW WE NEED TO FORCE THE COURTS TO ACT, AND NOT TO ABUSE THEIR OFFICE THROUGH COURTROOM FRAUD!

THE LAND REGISTRY, HMRC, ENTRUST, THE POLICE, BUT MOST OF ALL PARLIAMENT SHOULD BRING ALL TO BOOK THAT HAVE AND ARE STILL COLLUDING TO GAIN STATUS AS WORTHY TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC PURSE AND THE LAWS OF THIS LAND, PERHAPS ALL HEADS OF PARTIES SHOULD NOW GET TOGETHER AND SERVE THE BRITISH PEOPLE IN THE MANNER YOU CLAIM TO DO.