Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS

click here to read more

The Governement should sycamore rider-friendly policy !

Natural England

Tony Barnett responds to the attack on Natural England by Ian Liddell Grainger MP

"THE COMMON LANDS NOW AT RISK OF SUCH FRAUD, ARE COMMON LANDS THAT ARE REGISTERED AS SECTION 45's OF THE 2006 COMMONS ACT, WHICH SIMPLY MEANS THAT THE COMMON'S COMMISSIONER WAS UNABLE TO TRACE AN OWNER WITH TITLE OR PRE REGISTER TITLE TO THE COMMON LAND."

Says Tony Barnett

Says Tony Barnett I AM NOT A CONSTITUENT, MY REASON FOR WRITING IS IN CONNECTION TO AN ARTICLE WHICH HAS APPEARED ON A WEB PAGE THAT I SUBSCRIBE TO WWW.HORSEYTALK.NET

YOU WILL BE SURPRISED AT THE AMOUNT OF MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT SHARE YOUR COMMENTS. THESE TOO ARE NOT ALL OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS, BUT COME FROM THE ENTIRE COUNTRY THAT HAS COMMON LANDS IN THEIR AREA.

APPROACHES HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTED TO REACH DR PHILIPS AND HER SENIOR POUL CHRISTENSEN REGARDING WHAT CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED AS SUPPORTING FRAUD, WHICH THEY ARE PART, THE COLLUSION TO OBTAIN HLS FUNDING, WITH LOCAL COUNCILS AND OTHER "CONSERVATIONISTS".

I HAVE SPOKEN TOO COLIN DRAPER, HE IS THE SENIOR OFFICER (VERDERER) FOR HLS.

MY ENQUIRES CENTRED AROUND THE PROCEDURE IN OBTAINING HLS FUNDING, HE WAS QUITE EXPLICIT IN HIS GUIDANCE ON THE CORRECT AND ONLY ROUTE TO TAKE.

HE STRESSED THAT ONE MUST FIRST APPROACH YOUR AREA OFFICER OF NATURAL ENGLAND TO VISIT AND DO AN ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMON LAND, THERE THE OFFICER WOULD REQUIRE EVIDENCE OF OWNERSHIP IE TITLE DEEDS BEFORE THEY CAN PROCEED. COMMONERS WOULD NEED TO FORM AN ASSOCIATION AND MAKE AN APPLICATION THAT WAY. HOWEVER, IT WOULD BE TOUCH AND GO IF HLS WOULD BE GIVEN.

THE REASON FOR COMMONERS TO BE REJECTED IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON COMMONERS RIGHTS, WHICH INCLUDE THAT THEY MAY NOT LET,LEASE,SELL OR EXTINGUISH THOSE RIGHTS FROM THE PROPERTY (APPLICATION LANDS).

MOST APPLICANTS NOW ARE THE LOCAL AUTHORITY, A JUNIOR MEMBER OFFICER MAKES THE APPLICATION TO PINS, THIS APPLICATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CEO.

THE APPLICATION TO PINS IS THAT OF AN OWNER, THIS IS WHERE NATURAL ENGLAND'S STATEMENT OF TRUTH (STATUTORY DECLARATION SHOULD BE ATTACHED TO VALIDATE THE CLAIMS OF OWNERSHIP), NEVER HAS SUCH A STATEMENT BEEN IN EVIDENCE, BUT, AN UNNAMED MEMBER OF NATURAL ENGLAND, GIVES LOCAL SUPPORT( PHILIPS OR CHRISTENSEN ARE NOT AWARE OF THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING, JULIE LUNT, THE "LEGAL" PREVENTS ANY ACCESS TO EITHER).

HOWEVER, THE CONSENT IS GIVEN (MOSTLY), BUT WITH A CAUTION "SUPPLEMENTARY" WHICH STATES THAT PROVIDING THE WORKS ARE NOT IN BREACH OF ANY ENACTMENT OR BYE-LAW THEY WILL BE LAWFUL.

YOU WILL UNDERSTAND, IAN, THAT THE COURTS WILL SUPPORT THE LOCAL AUTHORITY, AND WILL ACCEPT THE "PROVISIONAL CONSENT" AS PROPER CONSENT FROM THE SECRETARY OF STATE, WHICH IT IS NOT!

THE COMMON LANDS NOW AT RISK OF SUCH FRAUD, ARE COMMON LANDS THAT ARE REGISTERED AS SECTION 45's OF THE 2006 COMMONS ACT, WHICH SIMPLY MEANS THAT THE COMMON'S COMMISSIONER WAS UNABLE TO TRACE AN OWNER WITH TITLE OR PRE REGISTER TITLE TO THE COMMON LAND.

THE FIRST ENACTMENT BREACH THEN IS FALSE REPRESENTATION TO PINS, THE SECOND IS MORTGAGE FRAUD, FULLY SUPPORTED BY NATURAL ENGLAND'S AREA OFFICER FOR HLS, THIS IS BY WAY OF USING THE COMMON LAND AS COLLATERAL.

COMMON LANDS THAT ARE SECTION 45 WILL NOT HAVE ANY BYE-LAWS, NOT UNLESS THEY ARE SUBJECT TO THE 1876,1899 REGULATION ACT FOR AIR, EXERCISE AND RECREATION.

INNOCENT MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HAVE BEEN DRAGGED THROUGH THE COURTS FOR OPPOSING SUCH APPLICATIONS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON PUBLIC OPEN ACCESS TO COMMON LAND, I FOR ONE AND TWO OF MY COLLEAGUES HAVE RECEIVED A SUSPENDED PRISON SENTENCES FOR OUR ACTIONS, YET THE LEGISLATION PROVIDES THAT IF ANY WORKS ARE UNLAWFUL, THE PUBLIC HAVE THE RIGHTS TO ENFORCE AGAINST THEM.

MITIGATION IS NOT ACCEPTED BY THE COUNTY COURTS, THEY SUPPORT THE LOCAL COUNCILS, ONE CANNOT HAVE APPLICATIONS FOR DISCLOSURE AND WITNESS SUMMONSES APPLIED TO NATURAL ENGLAND AND THE COUNCIL.

BELIEVE IT OR NOT, LAMBETH PALACE IS INVOLVED WITH FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS WITH WORCESTER COUNCIL OVER COMMON LAND IN THEIR AREA, IT IS MY INTENTION TO WRITE TO THE QUEEN AND TO THE ARCH BISHOP BECAUSE THE SUSPENDED PRISON SENTENCE IS FOR OBJECTIONS TO THE CLAIMS AND CRIMINAL DAMAGE TO THIS COMMON LAND.

I FOR ONE DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO BIO DIVERSITY, AS YOU SAY PHILIPS IS ABLE TO DISGUISE THE MEANING, HOWEVER I DO SUBSCRIBE TO NATURAL PHENOMENA, THAT WILL BE MORE DIFFICULT FOR HER AND OTHERS TO DISGUISE.

PLEASE DO NOT SUGGEST I WRITE TO MY MP, HE DOES NOT ACCEPT ANY WRONG DOING, BY THE WAY HE IS THE NEW SOS

I pine for a more sensible approach to saving our forests

Read more here


Email this to a friend !!

Enter recipient's e-mail: