Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS
Tony Barnett writes to Surrey County Council
THESE ARE PUBLIC DOCUMENTS, AND OPEN TO INSPECTION OR TO TAKE COPIES AT ALL REASONABLE TIMES.
Says Tony Barnett
YOUR EMAIL STATES THAT SURREY CC HOLDS CHOBHAM COMMON IN FEE SIMPLE AS FREEHOLD COMMON LAND.
THEREFORE, WITHOUT DOUBT, YOUR OFFICE WILL HOLD PRE REGISTRATION OF TITLES, THESE DOCUMENTS WILL, IF, CORRECT, SHOW OWNERSHIP, PRE 1189 GIVING A FULL HISTORY OF THE COMMON LANDS HELD AS DEMENSE LANDS OF LORD/LADY OF THE MANOR'S ESTATE.
TO INCLUDE ANY GRANTS OF EASEMENTS, IF THE LORDS/LADIES EVER USED QUASI RIGHTS, WAS ANY OF THE COMMON LAND SUBJECT TO RIGHTS OF PARTS THEREOF TO ENCLOSURE (219 1285 ACT), COMMONERS RIGHTS AND THE PRODUCT TO WHICH THE COMMON WAS CAPABLE OF PRODUCING.
THE DEEDS WOULD ALSO SHOW USE BY THE MONARCH IN TIMES OF BATTLES, IN FACT EVERY DETAIL TO WHICH CHOBHAM COMMON WAS SUBJECTED TO.
DETAILS OF "VESTING" IS NOT CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF OWNERSHIP OR OF RIGHTS AS YOU DESCRIBE, BEING HELD, SUBJECT OF VESTING, AS IN THE 1965 CRA GIVES THE "HOLDER" NO JURISDICTION.
MY APPLICATION IS THEREFORE, FOR DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW THE EVIDENCE AS DESCRIBED ABOVE "FREEHOLD TITLE" TO BE DISCLOSED.
THE EVIDENCE APPLIED FOR, SHOULD BE HELD WITH OTHER REGISTERED MATTERS, ie COMMON "OWNERS REGISTER" THIS IS REQUIRED BY THE LEGISLATION AS IS THE COMMONERS RIGHTS REGISTER.
THERE WILL BE CLAUSE/ACT OR SECTION UNDER FOI TO WHICH THE APPLICATION MAY BE REFUSED, THESE ARE PUBLIC DOCUMENTS, AND OPEN TO INSPECTION OR TO TAKE COPIES AT ALL REASONABLE TIMES.