My Barrister continued, “This additional information will help determine whether the actual effect on the Register was that the 80 acres were removed from the Land Section, in addition to Mr Connell’s rights being removed from the Rights section, which is what the Applicant currently believes must have occurred. (However, and as already mentioned, even if that were the case, the 2006 Act will in fact provide a mechanism for the 80 acres to be restored to the Register in due course)."
Conclusion
The Applicant maintains her position that the Order made in this matter ought to be confirmed. The historical map evidence, the modern user evidence, and the history of his area of Broxhead Common together yield no other possible conclusion.” 18 May 2011.
Next time: The start of the Public Inquiry to confirm the already made 2008 Order for a bridleway between Broxhead Common BW54 to Cradle Lane.
It’s vitally important that riders know and maintain their Rights of Way.
If we don’t know and maintain our Rights of Way, we will have less and less land on which to ride.
The problem is knowing our Rights of Way!
“Without horseytalk we might as well all dig a hole and jump into it.” Maureen Comber
If anyone has tales they would like to tell or malfeasance they would like to reveal or something they are passionate about, then please get in touch.
Email: info@horseytalk.net