The Battle for Broxhead Common
The Battle for Broxhead Common
Embedded Files
Broxhead Common
The Case for Hampshire County Council – PART 81
The Case for Hampshire County Council – PART 81
To continue looking at the Judgement by the High Court from Brightman J on 24th March 1977.
Page 13 paragraphs G, H, dismisses Mr Whitfield’s appeal so far as Mr Connell of Lindford Bridge House, is concerned.
1977 High Court Judgement Brightman J 1977 Pages 10-25 23012016Page 14 paragraph A. begins examination of Mrs Cooke
Page 18 paragraph F-H Brightman “the Commissioner erred in law in finding in her favour.”
Page 19 paragraph A, the Appeal is dismissed. The failure of Mrs Cooke to make her case was, according to the Judge “rather ancillary and peripheral.
The reason for this is explained on the next page.Page 20 paragraph A. Brightman “There was no appeal on the manorial part of the Cooke case,” to which Sir Frederick Corfield replies “That is correct.”
Costs now become the issue.
Page 21 paragraph F, the appellant to pay two thirds of the respondents costs.
Paragraph H states it is more appropriate for the Commons Commissioner to make any alteration to the register.
Next time: to be continued:
Broxhead Common
Riders have Rights
Riders have Rights
It’s vitally important that riders know and maintain their Rights of Way.
If we don’t know and maintain our Rights of Way, we will have less and less land on which to ride.
The problem is knowing our Rights of Way!
“Without horseytalk we might as well all dig a hole and jump into it.” Maureen Comber
Contact Us
Contact Us
If anyone has tales they would like to tell or malfeasance they would like to reveal or something they are passionate about, then please get in touch.
Email: info@horseytalk.net
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse